Note · Pricing

How much does a statistician cost in 2026?

Most statistical consultants publish nothing, so the first quote you receive is also the first number you have ever seen. This note collects the rates that are published — by university consulting centers, private firms, and independent statisticians — so you can judge a quote before you accept it. All figures are from the providers' own price pages as of late August 2026; follow the links for the current versions.

Hourly rates

University consulting centers set the floor. UC Irvine's Center for Statistical Consulting charges $115 per hour for its own researchers, $152 for non-profits, and $178 for commercial clients. Private firms sit above that: Professional Statistical Services lists $125–150 per hour for researchers and $150–250 for business clients (and $525–750 for forensic and expert-witness work); Omega Statistics lists $175 per hour for researchers and $250 for corporate clients.

The practical range for an experienced statistician in the United States is therefore $125–250 per hour, with university centers at $115–178 and commercial or litigation work above $250.

Per-project prices

Hourly rates are hard to budget, so many independent statisticians quote fixed prices for defined pieces of work. Fisher Statistics, a solo PhD practice, describes small projects at about $500, medium projects at $1,500–2,500, and complex projects up to about $3,500. DK Statistical Consulting sets a $750 minimum for a new client and notes that analysis with a written results section has never come in under $1,000; its analysis-plus-results packages run $1,800–2,700. Omega Statistics prices a dissertation results analysis from $2,000, a protocol review from $2,000, and a sample-size calculation from $1,000.

Publisher services occupy the low end with tightly scoped products: Editage sells a rapid statistical review for $200 and an inferential analysis for $1,200, delivered by staff biostatisticians. Expert manuscript review that bundles statistical review with subject-matter review typically runs $1,000–1,800 per manuscript.

What drives the price

Four things move a quote more than anything else. Scope: one focused question costs a fraction of "look at everything." Data readiness: cleaning, merging, and reshaping are usually billed separately, because nobody can price them before seeing the data. Deliverable: a conversation is cheapest, written notes cost more, and reproducible code with a memo costs the most — and is worth the most, because you can rerun it. Who does the work: a firm's junior analyst and a senior statistician who has taught the method for twenty years are not the same product, whatever the hourly rate says.

Budgeting it in a grant

Funders routinely accept statistical consulting as a direct cost, and reviewers increasingly expect it. Ask the consultant for a written scope and quote before you submit; that document is your budget justification. For a typical single-study project, budget the consultation and review stage separately from the analysis stage — the first is small and certain, the second depends on the data.

Red flags

Be cautious with anyone who guarantees significance, acceptance, or a passed defense; who offers to write your results or discussion section; who promises same-day analysis of a dissertation dataset; or who will not put scope, deliverables, and price in writing before starting. None of those is a statistics service.

Where StatGazer sits

Our published research packages start at $500 for a Written Research Consultation on one focused question, $750 for a Methods & Analysis Review with written notes and clarification by email, and $1,500 for a Statistical Analysis Engagement delivered as reproducible code with a memo. Every engagement is founder-led, scoped in writing before payment, and bounded by the same rule: the research stays yours. Details and the fine print are on the statistical consulting page.

Sources

A defined first step

Start with the smallest useful scope.

Compare the published packages, or send a short project brief for a written fit assessment.